n8n vs Zapier: An Engineer's Honest Take
After implementing dozens of automation solutions, here's my breakdown of when to use n8n versus Zapier (and when neither is the right choice).
Sebastian Vallejo If you’re evaluating automation tools, you’ve probably seen the usual comparisons. “Zapier is easier! n8n is more powerful!”
Here’s what those comparisons miss.
The Real Question
It’s not about which tool is “better.” It’s about which tool fits your constraints:
- Technical capability of your team
- Budget sensitivity
- Data privacy requirements
- Complexity of your workflows
When Zapier Wins
Choose Zapier when:
- You need something working in the next hour
- Your workflows are linear (A → B → C)
- You have budget but not engineering time
- Data stays within well-known SaaS tools
Zapier’s strength is accessibility. A marketing manager can connect HubSpot to Slack without writing a line of code.
When n8n Wins
Choose n8n when:
- You need loops, conditionals, or error handling
- Data privacy matters (self-hosted option)
- You’re doing 10,000+ executions/month
- You have engineers who can maintain it
n8n is what Zapier would be if it were built by engineers, for engineers.
When Neither Wins
Consider custom code when:
- You need sub-second latency
- Your logic is too complex for visual tools
- You’re integrating with internal systems
- Scale requires optimization
The dirty secret of automation tools is that they’re all abstractions. Sometimes you need to drop down a level.
My Recommendation
Start with the simplest tool that solves your problem. That’s usually Zapier. Graduate to n8n when you hit limits. Build custom when you’ve proven the workflow matters.
The most expensive automation is the one that doesn’t ship.
Skip the boilerplate work
Don't build from scratch. Download the production-ready blueprint.
Browse Blueprints